Bias probe of vaping
Vaping is seen as a healthier alternative to smoking for many, but is this really the case? A motion raised by Lake Country Coun. In the motion, Gambell proposed there should be more education material, restraints on marketing laws and fines from the RCMP. The short- and long-term effects of vaping is unclear thus far, as it is still a fairly new topic being researched. However, there is speculation that vaping — especially with nicotine — can lead to addiction, chemical exposure that can lead to lung damage and in some cases, has been known to alter teen brain development, according to the of Canadian government.
We are searching data for your request:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.
Content:
SCIENCE OF VAPING PREVENTION
There is much discussion about willingness to enter debate about e-cigarettes following this letter from Professors McKee, Glantz, Chapman and Daube.
In July, I sent an email to Professor McKee of the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, challenging some of the criticisms of legitimate scientists he had made in the media, suggesting he discuss his concerns with the scientists he was criticising, and personally offering to debate with him debate in a public forum. You also refer to a letter written to WHO signed by you and others.
I would like to offer some feedback and put some questions to you on this. In this piece on the BBC this morning E-cigarettes less harmful than cigarettes , you are reported as follows:. This seems little short of reckless. What is the basis for your claims? Can you explain on what basis you make these statements and how you have assessed the significant body of evidence that does exist, including that considered in detail in the review just published?
Letters to WHO. It is possible that you have not yet seen or found time to study the critical commentary on this letter detailing some of the many errors of fact and interpretation contained in it. I enclose this commentary pdf attached and I hope you will read it carefully and reflect on whether you should be publicly referring to your letter as though it is a source of authority.
I have copied this letter to the signatories to the commentary, and I am sure many of them would welcome sight of your reaction as much as I would. Responsibility of public health commentators. Can you also explain the extent to which you have considered your own responsibility and accountability in this area?
It is quite plausible that the outcome of your campaigning against e-cigarettes is that people will believe the risks arising from e-cigarettes are far greater or more uncertain than they actually are, and, as a result, be deterred from using them and so continue to smoke. In that event, you may well be responsible for increasing avoidable smoking, protecting sales of cigarettes and causing more disease and death than there otherwise would be.
It would be helpful to understand: 1 if you have recognised the plausibility of this risk at all? Engagement in scholarship. Rather than rushing to make rapid-fire comments to the media, perhaps you would do more for public health if you took the time to read in detail the published review you are criticising Electronic cigarettes: review of use, content, safety, effects on smokers and potential for harm and benefit.
Once you have considered the analysis, may I suggest you invite the authors to discuss it with you? That way, you could probe and understand their perspective and you would be able to challenge their findings with any contrary evidence, principle or argument you believe to be relevant. Consider the impact on real people.
You are often making statements that many ordinary smokers and vapers believe bear no relation to their experience or to the facts as they know them, and at times they find your public comments upsetting or insulting.
Yet you do this with the trust and authority, and access to media and political influence, that comes with being a professor in a prestigious institution. May I suggest that you take a few minutes to read what some ordinary people say of their experience and try to understand what this means to them? Please see: Where is the humility, where is the empathy?
I hope you will respond to at least some of these concerns. I am sure I am not alone in worrying that the approach you take to e-cigarettes will cause far more harm than it prevents. You are of course entitled to hold whatever opinion you like, but it would be good to see you debate and defend your arguments openly. If you would like to debate with me in a public forum, I would welcome the opportunity — please let me know.
One of the problems with entrenched positions is that they have a tendency to get dug in deeper, especially in the glare of the public eye, social media etc. At the moment it quite hard to imagine one of the letter-writers appearing at an event like the e-cig summit. There seem to be quite a few events which are either pro or anti ecigs and vaping, but how much real dialogue is there? How does that happen? Mr Bates!
I suppose a vaper I must represent some form of future threat. Is Martin McKee actually, a scientist I. He seems to have qualifications as a doctor, which is not the same thing at all. His unwillingness to discuss his concerns with trained scientists might be down to his not being a scientist. Here is his CV. The DSc is something he had to apply to the university for, supported by his being a big noise in Public Health. It can only be for epidemiology in the loosest sense — not involving a high degree of statistical understanding.
The question is, it seems to me, how to get any access to the politicians, in order to counteract the lies and put the correct facts to them. I tried writing to David Cameron, but my letter was forwarded to the Dept of Health, who gave me their stock anti-e-cig response. I wrote to the MHRA and, after pushing them a bit, got a slightly better response — but nothing that was likely to reach or otherwise help influence the politicians. I wrote to my local MP and got a very anti-e-cig response — though they have since been in touch with a very slightly more moderate response.
I am currently writing to the media and their regulators every time I see rubbish published or spoken about e-cigs. Some success, but again very little. I can only hope that the efforts of more influential people than me — like Clive, Prof Farsolinos, Prof Britton and others — who can see the hope offered by e-cigs, will eventually have an impact on the law-makers. But I despair of our so-called democracy. Notify me of follow-up comments by email.
Notify me of new posts by email. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Skip to content There is much discussion about willingness to enter debate about e-cigarettes following this letter from Professors McKee, Glantz, Chapman and Daube. Stan knows that he is just venting air.
He will just sit this out. Pingback: The Worst Letter of — a review « The counterfactual. Pingback: A busy week in vaping! Pingback: Learning from history - Facts Do Matter. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. Comment Name Email Website Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Previous Previous post: Anti-complaint about e-cigarette advertising. Loading Comments Email Name Website.
Lung problems linked to e-cigarettes in the U.S. have Canadian health officials on alert
According to a report from The Swedish Council for Information on Alcohol and Other Drugs CAN on tobacco habits in Sweden —, about a quarter of the Swedish population use tobacco, either daily or occasionally [1]. Like snus, e-cigarettes are more commonly used by men. This systematic review investigates possible associations between using snus or e-cigarettes, and smoking tobacco. This field of research is rapidly expanding, when it comes to e-cigarettes, while the number of studies about snus is scarce. This systematic review provides a current review of the research. The literature was evaluated using a priori established protocols, and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.
Debating e-cigarettes with Professor Martin McKee
AllSides members can bookmark any article and read it later. Save this article by becoming a member today! Join AllSides to read, share and understand all perspectives of today's news and issues. Already on AllSides? Log In. Looking for results from think tanks and policy groups? Try the Balanced Think Tank Search. Go ad-free! Support AllSides.
Access Denied
Already a subscriber? Click here to login. Enter your details below and select your area s of interest to receive Law Employment Authority daily newsletters. First Name. Last Name.
HRB National Drugs Library
Metrics details. Concerns have been raised that observing other people using e-cigarettes may undermine motivation to quit by renormalising smoking. Data were from 12, smokers in England who participated in the Smoking Toolkit Study between November and May At baseline, respondents were asked whether anyone other than themselves regularly used an e-cigarette in their presence, whether they had made a quit attempt in the past year and how motivated they were to stop. Data at 6-month follow-up were available for respondents, who reported on whether they had attempted to quit in the past 6 months.
Will Trump take action on medical crisis of youth vaping?
E-mail: aneta. We spend about two thirds of our time in private homes where airborne particles of indoor and outdoor origins are present. The negative health effects of exposure to outdoor particles are known. The characteristics of indoor airborne particles, though, are not well understood. The chemical composition and concentration of particles indoors showed large differences compared to outdoors. The average indoor to outdoor ratios were 5. Four factors were identified in the source apportionment of organic particle fraction by applying positive matrix factorization PMF : two cooking factors, one e-cigarette factor and one outdoor contribution OOA organic factor penetrated from outside. Airborne particle levels indoors can be affected by several processes, such as active indoor sources, occupant behavior, physicochemical processes indoors and infiltration of outdoor particles, which in turn depends on the outdoor particle characteristics and factors affecting infiltration such as type of building, its ventilation, airtightness, and airing practice.
Hopper, Louise The contribution of cognitive biases to the development and maintenance of smoking-related addiction in adolescents and adults. PhD thesis, Trinity College Dublin. Anomalies between self-reported smoking intentions and actual smoking behaviour are common, yet few studies investigate both the explicit and implicit measurement of smoking cognitions within the same sample. Nor do many studies consider implicit adolescent smoking cognitions, despite the knowledge that smoking onset typically occurs during this pe
A second-year University of Minnesota medical resident appears to be succeeding at something that has frustrated veteran public health experts for years — getting teenagers to listen to warnings about the hazards of vaping. Rose Marie Leslie has amassed , followers on the social media video site TikTok, using her DrLeslie account to blow steam about the stresses of medical residency, to amuse people with her skits, but especially to give people public health messages in a plain-spoken way. Her side-by-side images of chest X-rays from a healthy person and a person who vapes drew nearly , likes and 3. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The year-old started using TikTok to post humor videos on lunch breaks and after her shifts — in one post wrapping a stethoscope around her forehead and pretending to be the Purple Doctorfish from SpongeBob cartoons.
A renewed push for recreational marijuana in New York next year faces threats spanning from deadly vaping-related illnesses to entrenched opposition led by doctors, educators and law enforcement. Amid thousands of lung injuries tied to marijuana vaping and mounting state budget gaps , lawmakers and advocates are bracing for a political brawl over legalizing cannabis use for adults in , after a similar bid failed earlier this year. Some doctors, parents and anti-marijuana groups suggested the outbreak of vaping-related illnesses this year underscored cannabis risks, adding to their long-standing concerns about legal weed fueling drugged driving and youth marijuana use. Marijuana supporters, however, noted many of the lung illnesses have been linked to black-market vaping products and asserted it is a reason to create a tightly regulated legal cannabis marketplace. Peter Harckham, D-South Salem, one of the key lawmakers who derailed legal weed this year.
News that nearly cases of severe lung disease in the U. The Public Health Agency of Canada has alerted provincial and territorial health officials and asked them to report any possible incidents. Awareness about links between vaping and lung illness could change in light of revelations by the U.
Here actually a showroom which that
This is incredible!