Free speech book
In the wake of the attack on Bookmarks Bookshop in London, we've pulled together a list of 6 books about the importance of free speech from some of our leading writers. History does not repeat, but it does instruct. In the twentieth century, European democracies collapsed into fascism, Nazism and communism. These were movements in which a leader or a party claimed to give voice to the people, promised to protect them from global existential threats, and rejected reason in favour of myth. European history shows us that societies can break, democracies can fall, ethics can collapse, and ordinary people can find themselves in unimaginable circumstances. Timothy argues that today, we need to learn from their experience to resist the advance of tyranny.
===We are searching data for your request:
Free speech book
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.
Content:
Against Free Speech
I wonder when I read reviews pointing out the problematics of a novel, whether the point is not that the readers were offended to the extent that it had to be mentioned in their review but rather it is like putting your pronouns in your Twitter bio. It is a statement of allegiance more than of real feeling. Or, is it that should the reviewer not mention that they disagree with the opinions of the characters, or the writer, or the lack of representation of any particular minority; it will be interpreted as an agreement with the views of any and all characters as well as the author.
It should be noted that the antecedents of the author are also important, as the British Library so helpfully pointed out, so readers of Byron, Wilde or Hughes not indicating in their review that they do not support slavery should be assumed to be in favour of it. While I'm on the point, referring to an artist by their surname only is problematic as it 'discriminates against black or female composers who are called by their full names'.
I should be reassuring and say that of course if you fail to mention that you are against the injustice in Pride and Prejudice of the Bennet sisters not inheriting you are tacitly supporting primogeniture.
Not deploring the lack of black characters in The Great Gatsby, is an ominous silence that can only indicate secret feeling of white supremacy. By reading a novel that does not have any transgender or disabled characters, you are colluding in a conspiracy to silence these marginalised voices by reading a book that failed to represent them, and will be condemning yourself as a non-ally, a part of the oppressor class, especially if you read something by a heterosexual white man.
Reading a work written in standard English is a mark against you, it ignores the demands of black linguistic justice by "using academic language and standard English as the accepted communicative norm, which reflects white mainstream English" and this "creates a climate of racialised inferiority toward Black Language and Black humanity.
The only mitigation open for you, my dear phobic reviewer, is to restrict your reading to only books written either by or about ethnic or sexual minorities, preferably written in dialect. Should the western canon ever be read, as it should not be as the term classic is applied only to the patriarchal offerings of white men, it must be qualified by an assertion in your review that even though a Dickens novel has been read, you the reader, are fully aware of his privilege and racism and that his books are only popular because he is a man and his popularity among the working classes of the nineteenth century was only so that they could read reflections of their own misogyny and colonialism.
Reading as a performance of one's own virtue, does not impress me. Saying what you really think is harder but you will feel better afterwards. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Want to Read saving…. Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Other editions.
Enlarge cover. Error rating book. Refresh and try again. Open Preview See a Problem? Details if other :. Thanks for telling us about the problem. Return to Book Page. Towards the end of the twentieth century, those who advocated what became known as 'Political Correctness' rightly identified the ways in which marginalised groups were often disparaged in everyday speech.
Casual expressions of homophobia, racism and sexism went from being commonplace to being rejected by the vast majority of the public over the course of just two decades. Since then, the victories of Political Correctness have formed the basis for a new intolerant mindset, one that seeks to move beyond simply reassessing the social contract of shared discourse to actively policing speech that is deemed offensive or controversial.
Rather than confront bad ideas through discussion, it has now become common to intimidate one's detractors into silence through 'cancel culture', a ritual of public humiliation and boycotting which can often lead to the target losing his or her means of income.
Free Speech is a defence of our right to express ourselves as we see fit, and takes the form of a letter to those who are unpersuaded. Taking on board legitimate concerns about how speech can be harmful, Andrew Doyle argues that the alternative - an authoritarian world in which our freedoms are surrendered to those in power - has far worse consequences.
Get A Copy. Kindle Edition , pages. More Details Other Editions 5. Friend Reviews. To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. Lists with This Book. Community Reviews. Showing Average rating 4. Rating details. Sort order. When I pick up a book about the free speech, I'm never sure what I'm going to get.
I'll either get well-thought arguments from authors like Jonathan Haidt and Greg Lukianoff or books with weak arguments that seem like a cash grab from authors like Dave Rubin and Gad Saad.
So, when I read this new book from Andrew Doyle, I was pleasantly surprised in the best way. By far, this is one of the better books on the subject, and I really enjoyed it. It's a short read, but it packs a lot of power. In 20 When I pick up a book about the free speech, I'm never sure what I'm going to get. In , I was cancelled and had hundreds of thousands of strangers on the internet coming after me, so this is a topic that I'm interested in. I'm often conflicted because I'm quite liberal, and free speech is typically associated with the Right.
When an author like Andrew Doyle comes around and is able to maturely discuss how there are awful people out there like Nazi's, but we need better conversations around free speech, I respect it.
If you're interested in this subject as well, you should really grab a copy of this book. View all 8 comments. Mar 03, Ewell Gregoor rated it it was amazing. Paul Embery suffered the same fate when he released his book, Despised, late last year. The authoritarian left does not take criticism well, that is axiomatic. However, they particularly object when the criticism comes from those also on the left, of which Doyle most certainly is.
Where the broken political wings paradigm is barely mentioned. Of course, many free-speech activists, including myself, will be drawn to this book. But it struck me when reading that we were not the intended audience.
You see, far from being a polemic against the authoritarian left, as one might expect, Doyle attempts to reason and offer an olive branch to those who are guilty of calling for the state to intervene and define the parameters of free speech.
The book is a concise, page account, consisting of 18 short chapters. Doyle presents contemporary examples of state overreach in regards to speech. You may have reservations about this view. You may believe that unlimited speech enables the worst elements of us to commit harm. This is of course true.
I have always found it queer that those who are in favour of state control over speech, are the ones who often claim not only the ubiquity of racism in society, but that racism has also infiltrated the British Government. Why on earth, therefore, would you want said Government to increase their power, regulate and compel speech? The second point which Doyle returns to, in attempts to convince his opponents; once laws and regulations are passed, they will eventually be used as a tool against those who seek to censor, as much as everyone else.
Doyle explains that the law in question was later used by the Thatcher government against protesting miners in the s. In the past decade, free speech has been framed as left vs right debate. The decision of the left to allow themselves to be placed on the side opposed to civil liberty is a stupidity words cannot describe.
It is perverse when one considers the history of the Labour Party. The Labour Party are a movement with a proud history of standing up for liberty. The Idiosyncratic former Labour Leader, Michael Foot, who is often unfairly maligned by history, gave a rousing speech in the commons in the s when the government organised a samizdat against the Daily Worker publication. Free speech is the mechanism for challenging power and changing orthodoxies.
Whilst opponents of free speech will claim that at its worst, it can severely offend the less powerful, but also be aware, without free speech, homosexuals, non-whites and other minority groups would not have the freedoms they enjoy today. As I stated before, the author did not frame his arguments from a left and right perspective, something I think was deliberate. That is why the claim of an echo chamber is frivolous.
Doyle explains that the battle to preserve civil liberty is liberty vs authority, and not right vs left. Doyle is right. I have covered this subject ad nauseum within my writings and on my social media. But I will repeat one last time. Whilst woke culture masquerades as liberal, by all definitions of the word, it is the opposite.
Those who seek to restrict or compel speech are nothing other than authoritarian, no matter how well-intentioned. You stop being liberal when you say the words, I believe in free speech BUT. It is worth remembering, even the worst dictators in history allowed speech they agreed with. To say, I believe in free speech but, is to throw yourself in with the worst of them. View all 3 comments. Mar 13, Carl Buckfield rated it it was amazing.
This is a great concise and accessible book which puts forward the arguments for free speech and deals with the counterarguments and misconceptions of free speech. A must read for all, but I assume those most in need of reading it won't. A brilliant and to the point defence of free speech for our times. Mar 01, Sobriquet rated it it was amazing Shelves: non-fiction , non-fiction-shelf. Orwell called this the 'gramophone mind', content to play the record of the moment whether or not one is in agreement' Critics, too, now regularly assess artistic works on the basis of how closely the artist reflects their own ideological perspective.
It goes without saying that total objectivity is neither possible nor desirabl "There will always be those whose instinct inclines towards submission to authority, who are happy to shift beliefs in accordance with the fashion or decrees from above.
It goes without saying that total objectivity is neither possible nor desirable when it comes to professional criticism, but it would appear that a significant proportion now see their role as censuring art that they perceive to be 'problematic'. Popular culture, then, becomes a means of social control, which is why 'representation' and sending the 'correct' moral message are seen as so crucial.
But artists are by no means obliged to provide moral instruction, either through their lives or their work.
Book Review: Free speech on campus
NASPA is a member-centered association supporting a diverse and passionate network of 15, professionals and 1, institutions across the globe. Whether you are looking for a transformational in-person experience, or wanting to learn and engage from where you are, NASPA has the perfect professional development for you. As higher education continues to evolve, NASPA serves a leading role in the innovations that are shaping the future of student affairs. Chemerinsky, E. Free speech on campus. New Haven: Yale University Press. Administrators in higher education walk a tightrope between protecting the right of individuals to freely express themselves while ensuring their campuses are safe environments.
Free Speech in the United States
The distinctly contemporary proliferation of pornography and hate speech poses a challenge to liberalism's traditional ideal of a 'marketplace of ideas' facilitated by state neutrality about the content of speech. This new study argues that the liberal state ought to depart from neutrality to meet this challenge. Clear, well organized, and thoroughly argued, it simultaneously provides a non-superficial introduction to the central theoretical issues at the intersection of political philosophy and free speech and significant food for thought for those more familiar with the relevant topics. JavaScript is currently disabled, this site works much better if you enable JavaScript in your browser. Publishing With Us. Book Authors Journal Authors. Free Preview. Buy eBook. Buy Hardcover. Buy Softcover.
Free Speech
In May of , a source in Brazil provided me with a massive archive of secret documents downloaded from the telephones of powerful Brazilian officials that consumed the next year of my life while reporting it a new Wired article published on Friday tells part of that story. One of the effects of the ensuing intense controversies was that I was unable to finish an article I had been working on for months at the time: a lengthy, deeply reported examination of the internal war engulfing the ACLU, fueled by a raging conflict between its more traditional lawyers who still believe in the primacy of free speech and the need to defend it and the newer political liberal activists and lawyers who do not. Romero insisted to me that the ACLU had not retreated from its historic commitment to free speech nor its resolve to avoid partisan politics despite a series of post-Charottesville memos and a highly-funded election campaign that certainly gave the opposite appearance. I knew Strangio as an excellent lawyer who earned my admiration from his years of dedication representing WikiLeaks whistleblower Chelsea Manning, and I joined him once at the ACLU headquarters for a videotaped discussion of that case.
The Fight for Free Speech
In this special issue, we offer a wide range of new and forthcoming books on free expression. With this book, Corn-Revere returns to the ranks of practicing First Amendment lawyers who have authored books on free speech — e. This eminently readable book yes, I read the manuscript is for anyone who wants to know more about why freedom of speech is important and how protections for free expression became part of the American identity. Corn-Revere also explains how the same tactics were tried and eventually failed in the 20th century, with efforts to censor music, comic books, television, and other forms of popular entertainment. The historic examples illustrate not just the mindset and tactics of censors, but why they are the ultimate counterculture warriors and why, in free societies, censors never occupy the moral high ground.
New Book Examines How The 1st Amendment Sits At The Forefront In An Election Year
Authors: Knowles , H. Judging Free Speech contains nine original essays by political scientists and law professors, each providing a comprehensive, yet concise and accessible overview of the free speech jurisprudence of a United States Supreme Court Justice. Keith J. My judgment: Judging Free Speech is highly recommended. Summing Up: Highly recommended. Upper-division undergraduates and above. Bowers, Choice, Vol. The book illuminates the complexity of the subject as well as its importance for our democratic institutions.
Free Speech
It came out in the wake of a presidency marked by persistent attacks on the very idea of freedom of expression. Trump ended his presidency by inciting a murderous assault on Congress. His congressional and political allies misused free speech doctrine to defend him on the specious grounds that the First Amendment protects incitement to riot and advocacy of criminal behavior that leads immediately and directly to violence and murder. What Holmes could not have predicted was that such speech would come from the government itself — or at least the lame-duck head of the government.
Free Speech in an Open Society
RELATED VIDEO: FREE SPEECH HANDBOOK TrailerAbout HUP eBooks. Harvard University Press has partnered with De Gruyter to make available for sale worldwide virtually all in-copyright HUP books that had become unavailable since their original publication. More about the E-ditions Program ». Free speech and a free press, guaranteed by the Bill of Rights, are threatened in peace time as well as in the time of crisis. In this book, which supersedes his Freedom of Speech , Zechariah Chafee discusses the meaning of freedom of speech in the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States as it has been interpreted by the Supreme Court, and gives an account of all the important events and decisions since affecting open discussion.
A Dozen Books for Defending Free Speech
Free speech is the bedrock of all our liberties, and yet in recent years it has come to be mistrusted. A new form of social justice activism, which perceives language as potentially violent, has prompted a national debate on where the limitations of acceptable speech should be drawn. Governments throughout Europe have enacted 'hate speech' legislation to curb the dissemination of objectionable ideas, Silicon Valley tech giants are collaborating to ensure that they control the limitations of public discourse, and campaigners in the US are calling for revisions to the First Amendment. However well-intentioned, these trends represent a threat to the freedoms that our ancestors fought and died to secure. In this incisive and fascinating book, Andrew Doyle addresses head-on the most common concerns of free speech sceptics, and offers a timely and robust defence of this most foundational of principles. Did She Kill Him?
Look Inside. Nov 09, ISBN Nov 09, Minutes.
There are no comments yet.