Gravity falls shape shifter episode speakers
Speaker National Assembly Asad Qaiser has said that the country is on the path of development and progress owing to successful policies of incumbent government. He said that country is on right path of progress under the leadership of Prime Minister of Pakistan Imran Khan. He said that the incumbent government has tackled lot of challenges successfully. He expressed these views while addressing a large public gathering in Marghuz Swabi. Speaker Asad Qaiser said that peaceful Afghanistan is vital for progress and development of the region.
We are searching data for your request:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.
Content:
Hanging Out
This multidisciplinary conference brought together outstanding researchers from all over the world to discuss how best to assess, establish and maintain the credibility and trustworthiness of expertise in a rapidly changing media environment.
Scholars presented their latest findings on questions of trust and trustworthiness, expertise, science and technology, policy, and the media. In democratic societies, trust in the provenance and justification of policy measures are essential for their implementation.
Trust in scientific expertise — both in experts and in scientific institutions — has become a contested subject in the wake of recent political and social developments, particularly the emergence of populist sentiments.
At the same time, newspapers and journalists have always played an important part in the shaping of public trust in public debates. However, the recent contestations also draw attention to questions of trust in media organizations. Are they fulfilling their role as watchdogs of democracy and mediators of informed public debate? Over the past decade, the traditional media landscape has substantially transformed into a globalized, technologically mediated and commoditized environment — a transformation that coincided with increasingly volatile levels of trust in institutions, whether academia, politics, governments, or legacy media.
Online sources for information, including information about various areas of scientific expertise, provide new, low-threshold opportunities to communicate. Social media, blogs and vlogs offer unlimited and boundless sources for the public to inform themselves quickly, mostly free of charge and everywhere.
The credibility and hence trustworthiness of such sources are difficult to assess. It is often unclear who says what in which context and based on what authority or expertise, particularly if information is decontextualized from its original source and distributed through social media. The problem of trust in social media has been further exacerbated by the persistent problem of fake news and disinformation.
Meanwhile, social media platforms have attempted to refurbish trust in their online channels by resorting to human and algorithmic gatekeeping, with so far mixed results.
Some of the most heated global discussions of our time directly implicate scientific knowledge claims. In recent years, the debates on Covid as well as climate change are just two of many popular examples of trust contestation. In , the corona-virus and its aftermath added a new stress test to public trust in science, politics, and media.
These online contestations show how geopolitical and ideological battles come to target not just political and scientific institutions, but also legacy media or a combination of all three, thus raising the stakes of understanding public trust under changing conditions. For any questions regarding the conference, please send an email to peritia allea.
We are always happy to help! In a world increasingly relying on knowledge, trust in trustworthy expertise is essential to achieve progress and well-being. We need experts to help policymakers and citizens take the correct decisions in important matters like health or climate change.
By doing so, we aim to enhance trust in democratic governance for the future of Europe. Prof Natali Helberger University of Amsterdam. Prof Michael Latzer University of Zurich. The authority of traditional gatekeepers of truth, knowledge, and expertise are challenged or side-steppped as a burgeoning of new media actors, processes, and institutions takes the stage.
The impacts of these changes for policy-making, science journalism, and public deliberation reveal but some of the emerging problems for science, news, and politics. In this talk, we address some of these key issues. To illustrate our arguments, we zoom in on the role of social media in the initial period of the Covid outbreak in the Netherlands.
Most importantly, the case shows how the media environments in which emergencies play out have been transformed by the logics of social media platforms, key among which are the commoditization of information and the decoupling of information from conventional modes of contextually assessing its trustworthiness.
In this talk, we move towards proposals for a better understanding of the shifting sands of trust and trustworthiness given the prevalence of digital platforms and social media communications. We seek to frame, spark, and engage with some of the valuable questions that will shape the course of the conference and the significant work on cases from a range of national settings and scientific disciplines that will be discussed. Being a prolific author on the topic of digital media and its impact, her work covers a wide range of topics in media theory, media technologies, social media, and digital culture.
She also plays a key role in academic and social debates in the Netherlands and Europe. From to she was Professor of Comparative Media Studies at the University of Amsterdam where she also served as Chair of the Department of Media Studies from to , and was the Dean of the Faculty of Humanities between and She is a member of PERITIA and interested in digital platforms and social media, particularly their everyday usage in contexts of plurality and difference.
Her work has focused on how platforms mediate emotional facets of experience, including feelings of intimacy, trust, and belonging. Her research has primarily explored these issues in relation to migration, diaspora, transnationalism, and multicultural diversity. Her PhD is in social and cultural anthropology Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam and drew on her fieldwork investigating the role of web media in cultural identity formation among young Iranian Americans in Los Angeles.
The media are so named because they are intermediaries: they enable originators of communication to reach recipients. Traditional intermediaries — publishers, newspapers, broadcasters — also help ensure that communication meets certain ethical and epistemic standards. Online providers enable originators to reach recipients, but they are not publishers.
Platforms are therefore intermediaries of a very different sort, and cannot be regulated as publishers. However, the ethical and epistemic standards of the communication these new intermediaries enable could be improved by removing the anonymity that currently cloaks and protects clients who purchase the targeted distribution of content.
This would help recipients to assess the content they receive, by revealing which ethical and epistemic standards the new intermediaries respect or flout. The analysis is divided into three sections. Plandemic spends considerable effort portraying the protagonist Judy Mikovits, a scientist discredited for scientific misconduct and a known anti-vax advocate, as a trustworthy expert who is compassionate and empathetic ethos. Additionally, Plandemic emphasises institutional attempts to silence Mikovits thereby making emotional appeals to her as a victim pathos.
This allows the viewer to connect with Mikovits despite her claims being rife with factual inaccuracies and narrative inconsistencies thereby faltering on logos.
The final section, using Plandemic as an example, examines how credibility indicators with regards to social media platforms and the effective mobilization of ethos and pathos allows misinformation to circumvent limitations at the level of logos to garner trust. Author s. His thesis focuses on vaccine hesitancy during the COVID pandemic as an instance of the breakdown of trust in scientific expertise. His interests include: Phenomenology, Philosophical perspectives on trust, Philosophy of science especially epidemiology and public health , and Post-Colonial thought.
Corona Madness? Whereas most cling to established experts and mainstream media for trustworthy information, many people distrust precisely their expertise and go to alternative media channels to find out what is really going on. This changing nature of information seeking and gatekeeping is not specific to the corona crisis, but relates to most contemporary controversies, from climate change to migration, and from geopolitics to terrorism.
Taking a closer look at the variety of suspicions, critiques and allegations are grouped together as corona conspiracy theories, it is hard to set all of them aside as flawed, dangerous and irrational.
Similarly, dominant academic diagnosis as to why people are attracted to counterhegemonic information as mere coping mechanisms in uncertain times has limitations as well.
As I argue from years of ethnographic research, to better understand the appeal and dangers of conspiracy theories, it is imperative to remain sensitive to their variety in contents, actors, meanings and plausibilities. Deploying a variety of qualitative research strategies, I take the corona pandemic as a case-study to explain in empirical detail how and why conspiracy theories proliferate and may be reduced by drawing connections to how our public authorities have managed, and mainstream media have covered the crisis.
Instead of the epistemologically dubious and sociologically counterproductive censorship by social media platforms, traditional media and public health authorities have done better by engaging with the concerns and allegations of the distrustful public.
He is editor-in-chief of the open-access Dutch-Belgian peer-reviewed journal Tijdschrift Sociologie. Public-opinion surveys have repeatedly shown that the rejection of scientific evidence, and expertise more generally, is associated with right-wing or libertarian political views. To date there is little evidence of any association between left-wing political views and rejection of scientific evidence or expertise.
What might explain this apparent asymmetry? What might explain the fact that distrust of science is seemingly focused on the political right? The norms of science may thus be in latent conflict with a substantial segment of the public. We additionally relate these findings to other forms of information that do not pertain to scientific issues, such as false statements by Donald Trump or other populist politicians, and suggest that the broad-based rejection of evidence by people on the populist right may reflect a distinct ontology of truth.
Stephan Lewandowsky is a cognitive scientist with an interest in how people update their memories if information they believe turn out to be false. He has become particularly interested in the variables that determine whether or not people accept scientific evidence, for example surrounding vaccinations or climate science.
Because his research speaks to important contemporary events, he frequently contributes to public debate through opinion pieces in the media and public engagement. Increased digitization has brought changes to the media landscape with people increasingly accessing information through digital platforms. These changes have brought new challenges related to the growing misinformation circulation, difficulties in assessing the reliability of sources, new pressures on traditional media, among others.
At the same time, new sources and channels became available for the general public, making it easier for citizens to search and share specific information, fact check traditional media news or consult specialized digital sources blogs, podcasts, documentaries on demand, etc.
Science has been at the eye of the hurricane in these troubled times. Anti-science movements find fertile ground on social media to disseminate misinformation. Scientists, science communicators and scientific organisations find it hard to compete in a public sphere packed with a multitude of voices and interests.
This paper aims to provide a better understanding about the pathways of trust and mistrust in scientific information in the context of a complex media environment where legacy media and new digital platforms coexist and interconnect. We will address how trust in scientific information is built on a process where citizens see themselves in need of taking up a more individualized active role in the evaluation of the information they access through their media repertoire. She is a sociologist and carries out research in social studies of science and technology.
Public opinion is shaped in significant part by online content, the sources of which may be journalistic, but also laypeople. This content can spread rapidly through social media networks and is algorithmically curated, often in non-transparent ways. This new and constantly evolving information ecosystem is designed by platform providers primarily to attract the attention of users, not to promote deliberate cognition and autonomous choice; information overload, finely tuned personalization and distorted social cues, in turn, pave the way for manipulation and the spread of false information.
Current countermeasures often rely on third-party fact-checking to symptomatically remedy some of these outcomes, but due to its risk of censorship or allegations thereof, it is potentially prone to undermine trust. Here, we address the question for an alternative solution: How can online environments provide context and promote autonomy, so as to empower individuals to make informed decisions themselves? This approach potentially avoids external judgements about content, but requires the design of an environment that allows people to become their own fact-checkers.
To achieve this goal, effective web governance informed by behavioural research is critically needed. In this work, we identify technologically available yet largely untapped cues that can be harnessed to indicate the epistemic quality of online content, the factors underlying algorithmic decisions and the degree of consensus in online debates.
We then map out two classes of behavioural interventions—nudging and boosting— that enlist these cues to redesign online environments for informed and autonomous choice and provide concrete suggestions for their implementation within the current ecosystem.
My work uses large data sets from social media to quantitatively access human behavior at the societal level, with a focus on how information is spreading on social networks. I am working on identifying meaningful cues for the quality and context of online information and how to make them more accessible to a large number of users. The negationist position of the Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro towards the Covid pandemic became known worldwide.
He did not waste opportunities to tell people not to abandon normal life, to contradict the temporary suspension of educational and commercial activities ordered by the state governors and to present hydroxicloroquine as a safe cure for the disease.
But what interest us here is the moment that follows his discourse to the nation. We collected a corpus of thousand tweets made with either hashtags in order to investigate how different political positions regarding the Covid pandemic relate to different kinds of information sources. We identified the hyperlinks used in the messages and categorized them trying to establish how the different groups refer to information sources. We understand information sources as an essential part of the mediation processes, as actors to whom is given legitimacy to produce and share information on a given issue.
In a context of epistemic crisis, more than understanding the role of each media, it is essential to understand which media are recognized and legitimized as mediators of information by different social groups in order to then be able to explore how this mediation is done. Partisan legacy media and the spread of misinformation on social media have precipitated a decline of trust in Indian journalism Aneez et al.
Spot the Impostor
The kids help Stan run 'The Mystery Shack', the tourist trap that he owns, while also investigating the local mysteries. In , Hirsch announced that the series would finish with its second season, stating that he chose to do it for the show to end with 'a real conclusion for the characters'. He later stated that he remains open to continuing the series with additional episodes or specials. Things are not what they seem in this small town, and with the help of a mysterious journal that Dipper finds in the forest, they begin unraveling the local mysteries. With appearances from Wendy Corduroy, Mystery Shack cashier; Soos Ramirez, a friend of Dipper and Mabel and handyman to Grunkle Stan; plus an assortment of other characters, Dipper and Mabel always have an intriguing day to look forward to. Mabel Pines voiced by Kristen Schaal [12] — The year-old[13] twin sister of Dipper Pines who wears various sweaters. Soos Ramirez voiced by Hirsch [12] — The year-old[14] handyman at the Mystery Shack who mostly says 'dude s ' whenever he begins or ends a sentence.
The 100 Sequences That Shaped Animation
Is there anything To be serious about beyond this otherness That gets included in the most ordinary Forms of daily activity, changing everything Slightly and profoundly, and tearing the matter Of creation, any creation, not just artistic creation Out of our hands, to install it on some monstrous, near Peak, too close to ignore, too far For one to intervene? Any response to Thomas Pynchon's fiction will likely be affected as much by what Pynchon withholds as by what he gives, so the dominant impression one of his novels leaves may be determined by what the reader considers the most significant unanswered questions. The Crying of Lot 49, for instance, refuses to answer many questions, but the question of how the story ends--what happens when the auctioneer announces lot overshadows anything else that seems to be missing from the book. But it is hard to imagine the novel with this piece of information added. It is even harder to imagine Gravity's Rainbow with all its absences present and unsettling questions answered. As in The Crying of Lot 49, much of what seems to be missing from Gravity's Rainbow is basic narrative information. The answers a reader most often wants pertain to the simple question of who is doing what. Partly because of this lack of basic narrative information, the novel, as Leo Bersani puts it, "permanently infects us with the paranoid anxieties of its characters" If we submit to this tendency to focus specifically on the narrative information missing from Gravity's Rainbow, how do we approach the following passage, occurring after the novel has devolved into a series of disconcerting, discontinuous fragments?
‘Luca’ Film Review: Pixar’s Sweet Sea Monster Tale Has a Lot Going on Beneath the Surface
HWA has broad reach to connect you with virtually any speaker worldwide, including some speakers which you'll find exclusively with HWA. These speakers seek to be represented exclusively by HWA since they value how we uniquely prepare them for your event and handle the logistics of getting the speaker to you. Take a look at our offering of exclusive speakers and contact us to get started. He receives rave reviews at every event thanks to his dynamic, informative presentations and openness with audience-members, such as: " Our attendees have been raving about your presentation and valuable insight!
Category Archives: 100 Greatest TV Episodes
Whether you need some help with math so you can help your child with math, you're looking for something new to do to keep your mind off the news, or you want to provide some structured time for your kids who are used to a by-the-bell school day, there are many options, and we're adding to our list every day! IMACS gives students a competitive edge by teaching them how to think critically using logic and reasoning. IMACS classes cover high-level material in fun and exciting ways designed to keep talented students challenged and engaged. Our courses are developed by the IMACS Curriculum Development Group and draw on an average of over 25 years' experience that includes an extensive amount of time teaching gifted children. IMACS serves students from all over the country as all classes will be virtual for Sign up for a free placement class today at www.
The vagueness of difference: you, the reader and the dream of gravity's rainbow
These reptoids help fund the work of the shadow government, which in turn ensures that the Earth stays at their preferred climate. At the center of the show is Reagan Ridley voiced by Lizzy Caplan , a brilliant but dysfunctional scientist who is ill-equipped to handle standard social niceties. As the series begins, Reagan is anticipating a promotion that would put her in charge at Cognito Inc. Inside the fight to save it. Behind the scenes, creator Lisa Hanawalt had outlets competing for her favor. The long production timeline involved in animation meant Takeuchi was developing the core concepts of the show before debunking conspiracies became a routine necessity of the news cycle. Still, when Takeuchi noticed that listening to these theories on the radio show was affecting her perspective, she knew it was time for a break.
Physiology 2021
Activation of the voltage-gated sodium channel underlies the upstroke of the cardiac action potential, its subsequent inactivation being fundamental to the establishment of a refractory period. Thus, the sodium channel is central to the orderly conduction of electrical activity through the heart and represents an important target for antiarrhythmic drugs. Biophysical and structural studies on mutations of the cardiac sodium channel known to cause arrhythmia and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy have provided insight both into the structural basis of channel function and into the physiological role of the channel.
The franchise focuses on various mobile apps involving anthropomorphic animal characters repeating things said by the user. The first app, Talking Tom Cat , was launched in July As of March , the apps have achieved more than 12 billion downloads. Talking Tom officially named as Talking Tom Cat is a video game released in by Outfit7, in which the title character, Tom, repeats anything said to him in a high-pitched voice, and interacts with the user.
Mason "Dipper" Pines [2] born August 31 [11] , 5 minutes after Mabel Pines [20] is a smart, curious, and adventurous year-old boy spending the summer with his Great Uncle Stan in Gravity Falls, Oregon , where he and his sister constantly encounter the town's paranormal tendencies. Armed with a mysterious journal he found in a hidden place in a tree in the forest, he is the overall main protagonist of Gravity Falls and he seeks to uncover the town's mysterious secrets. Dipper is represented by the pine tree in the Zodiac. Dipper was born on August At a young age, Dipper's mother would dress him up in a lamb costume and have him perform his signature song and dance, the " Lamby Lamby Dance.
Typically, the situation will involve the impostor and the real person standing side-by-side, both claiming to be the real one, and the other heroes must use their wits to identify who is who, usually by finding a quality that the real person doesn't have in comedic examples, a positive quality. Or the real person may ask that their friend shoot both of them just to guarantee they get the impostor and it's almost inevitable if the person has a super-healing power , which usually results in the heroes shooting the other one, because the impostor wouldn't be noble enough to suggest making the Heroic Sacrifice. This is often parodied these days where the impostor suggests it, knowing they'll assume the noble act to mark them out as the original —and sometimes double-parodied when this ends up outing him as the fake since the real person wouldn't be so noble. In live-action media this will usually be accomplished by having the same actor playing both roles with camera and editing tricks so that even the audience can't guess who is who, though it can also be done with identical-twin actors.
I, as a person not young, very rarely used blogs, considering them useless, but now I completely changed my mind by visiting this wonderful blog. Firstly, I liked the accessible interface and convenient navigation, and secondly, a huge amount of useful information that will be useful to me in my profession for sure. Now I will visit blogs much more often, and I will add this one to bookmarks for convenience. There were also a sufficient number of reviews, which testifies to the excellent administration. Thank you very much for opening my eyes. I will be your regular satisfied visitor.
You are making a mistake. I propose to discuss it.